Douglas et al v. Coloplast Corp.
Plaintiff: James Lanczycki and Tammy Douglas
Defendant: Coloplast Corp.
Case Number: 1:2021cv10339
Filed: March 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Marianne B Bowler
Referring Judge: Mark L Wolf
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2021 Filing 19 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 of Plaintiffs Tammy Douglas and James Lanczycki. (Langfield, Eric)
April 27, 2021 Filing 18 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 of Defendant Coloplast Corp.. (Bennett, Richard)
April 20, 2021 Filing 17 JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference . (Langfield, Eric)
April 3, 2021 Filing 16 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF RESCHEDULING. Scheduling Conference set for 4/27/2021 02:45 PM before Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. ALL COUNSEL ARE DIRECTED TO APPEAR BY PHONE by calling 888-675-2535 approximately five minutes prior to the conference, using Access Code 6641794. If, for some reason, the call is disconnected, dial back in. NOTE that yours may not be the first case called, but please remain on the line until it is.(Putnam, Harold)
April 2, 2021 Filing 15 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #14 Motion to Continue. The status conference is continued until April 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM. (Bowler, Marianne)
April 1, 2021 Filing 14 Assented to MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference to After April 12, 2021 by Coloplast Corp..(Bennett, Richard)
March 26, 2021 Filing 13 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing. Scheduling Conference set for 4/12/2021 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. ALL COUNSEL ARE DIRECTED TO APPEAR BY PHONE by calling 888-675-2535 approximately five minutes prior to the conference, using Access Code 6641794. If, for some reason, the call is disconnected, dial back in. NOTE that yours may not be the first case called, but please remain on the line until it is.(Putnam, Harold)
March 25, 2021 Filing 12 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. Referred for: Full Pretrial, Dispositive Motions (ptd), Report and Recommendations. (Loret, Magdalena)
March 24, 2021 Filing 11 STATE COURT Record Coloplast Corp. summons served on 2/9/2021, answer due 3/24/2021.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Copy of State Court Record (Answer filed in this Court))(Michienzie, Paul)
March 24, 2021 Filing 10 ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Jury Demand by Coloplast Corp..(Michienzie, Paul)
March 10, 2021 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Coloplast Corp., filed by Tammy Douglas, James Lanczycki.(Langfield, Eric)
March 8, 2021 Filing 8 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Coloplast Corp. answer due 3/24/2021. (Loret, Magdalena)
March 4, 2021 Filing 7 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Complaint of Plaintiff by Coloplast Corp..(Michienzie, Paul)
March 4, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric B. Langfield on behalf of Tammy Douglas, James Lanczycki (Langfield, Eric)
March 1, 2021 Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Baker, Casey)
March 1, 2021 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark L. Wolf assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary)
March 1, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard E. Bennett on behalf of Coloplast Corp. (Bennett, Richard)
March 1, 2021 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Coloplast Corp. identifying Corporate Parent Coloplast A/S for Coloplast Corp... (Michienzie, Paul)
March 1, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Coloplast Corp. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8658084 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Civil Action Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Summons and Return of Service, #4 Exhibit D - State Court on-line Docket Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet JS 44, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Category Form)(Michienzie, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Douglas et al v. Coloplast Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Lanczycki
Represented By: Eric B. Langfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Douglas
Represented By: Eric B. Langfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coloplast Corp.
Represented By: Paul Michienzie
Represented By: Richard E. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?