Ravida v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
| Anthony Ravida |
| Howmedica Osteonics Corporation |
| 1:2021cv10350 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Indira Talwani |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY STAY. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02768-IT et al. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 8 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Indira Talwani: Case Management Conference held on 3/24/2021. Case called. Court had colloquy with counsel re: Proposed Agenda 1436 ; Status of Compliance with Case Management Order Nos. 6 and 8, including Suggestions of Death and Motions to Withdraw. Counsel are directed to file any overdue motions to substitute or motions to withdraw within 30 days of today's date. Going forward, a conference will be held on any motion to w/draw as counsel once a written response from defendant is filed; conf. to include client, attorney, and leadership counsel. Counsel shall confer and file a new proposed scheduling order and shall include a proposal for the bellwether case selection process; proposed schedule due 5/19/21. The next Case Management Conference will be held remotely on 5/26/21 at 2:15 p.m. The Conference will be conducted by video. Counsel of record: To gain access to the hearing, please register at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html. (Counsel shall select "Public" as 'Sign-up Type'. Counsel shall enter Display Name and telephone number, for video access.)This hearing will be conducted by video conference. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the session's courtroom deputy as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html.For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the Court's general orders and public notices available on #www.mad.uscourts.govor contact media@mad.uscourts.gov.Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violations of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, or denial of entry to future hearings, and such other sanctions, including for contempt of court, as may be deemed appropriate or necessary by the court. (Court Reporter: Robert Paschal at rwp.reporter@gmail.com.) (Attorneys present: Peter J. Flowers; Walter Kelley; Ashleigh Raso; Ellen Relkin; C. Calvin Warriner, III; Michael J. Blakely, Jr.; Dawn Curry, Kim M. Catullo, Stephanie McGraw) Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02768-IT et al.(MacDonald, Gail) Modified on 3/24/2021: Corrected formatting code (Kelly, Danielle). Modified on 3/25/2021: Corrected docket text (Kelly, Danielle). |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #6 Master Long Form Complaint by Howmedica Osteonics Corporation.(Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 6 MASTER LONG FORM COMPLAINT against Howmedica Osteonics Corporation. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 5 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MDL Orders 1-13 (Attachments: #1 Case Management Order No. 1-9, #2 Protective Order, #3 ESI Order, #4 Fact Sheet Implementation Order, #5 Order Aiding Private Settlement, #6 Orders Extending Discovery Stay) (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Howmedica Osteonics Corporation. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MDL CASE OPENED, Direct file in the District of Massachusetts; Ravida v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation. In Re: Stryker Orthopaedics LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Howmedica Osteonics Corporation Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8662144 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Anthony Ravida. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Category Form)(Flowers, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ravida v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Ravida | |
| Represented By: | Peter J. Flowers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
