Goparian v. Worcester Police Department et al
Donovan Goparian |
Worcester Police Department, Joe Early, Terry McLaughlin, Tarckini, Maura Healey and Richardson |
In those Supervised by Sergeant Richardson |
1:2021cv10545 |
March 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
William G Young |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (adminn, ) |
Filing 4 Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. Correction: nature of suit corrected because: case was opened using the wrong nature of suit as such it will be reassigned in accordance with L.R. 40.1 (adminn, ) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Douglas P. Woodlock assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donovan Goparian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit inmate statement)(Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254, filed by Donovan Goparian.(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.