Lard v. USDFA et al
| Ellis Lard |
| USDFA, A. Boncher and Attorney General |
| 1:2021cv10642 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Douglas P Woodlock |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. Order entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2243 governing Section 2241 cases for service on respondents. See attached order.(PSSA, 5) |
| Filing 7 Letter/request (non-motion) from Ellis Lard. (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 1BST084792 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (McAlear, Jim) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Ellis Lard, filing fee Payment (Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Hearing, MOTION to Appoint Counsel ( Responses due by 5/3/2021) by Ellis Lard.(McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Douglas P. Woodlock assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Ellis Lard.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Ellis Lard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
