Martinez et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Plaintiff: Indalecio Mirelez IV and Andrea Martinez
Defendant: GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv10844
Filed: May 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: F Dennis Saylor
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2021 Filing 8 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered: AMENDED JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Appendix) Associated Cases: 1:15-md-02657-FDS et al. (Vieira, Leonardo)
June 2, 2021 Filing 7 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. JUDGMENT. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A) Associated Cases: 1:15-md-02657-FDS et al. (Vieira, Leonardo)
June 1, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF MDL CASE CLOSED, Direct file in the District of Massachusetts; In Re: Zofran (Ondansetron)Products Liability Litigation. Associated Cases: 1:15-md-02657-FDS et al. (Vieira, Leonardo)
June 1, 2021 Filing 5 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, defendant's renewed motion for summary judgment based on federal preemption is GRANTED. This memorandum and order shall apply to all cases presently pending in this multi-district litigation proceeding. So Ordered. Associated Cases: 1:15-md-02657-FDS et al.(Vieira, Leonardo)
May 21, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Currie, Haley)
May 21, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF MDL CASE OPENED, Direct file in the District of Massachusetts; Martinez, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. In Re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2657. (Finn, Mary)
May 21, 2021 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. (Finn, Mary)
May 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8786085 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Andrea Martinez, Indalecio Mirelez IV. (Attachments: #1 Category form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Graham, M.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Indalecio Mirelez IV
Represented By: M. Elizabeth Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Martinez
Represented By: M. Elizabeth Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?