Adames-Garcia v. Divris
| Jorge Adames-Garcia |
| Matthew Divris |
| 1:2021cv11016 |
| June 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 ELECTRONIC NOTICE issued requesting courtesy copy for #22 Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254, #21 Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254. Counsel who filed these documents are requested to submit a courtesy copy of them to the Clerk's Office. These documents must be clearly marked as a Courtesy Copy and reflect the document number assigned by CM/ECF. (Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Order to Set Briefing Schedule by Matthew Divris.(Bocian, Thomas) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE/ANSWER to Petition (Supplemental Answer/state-court record) by Matthew Divris. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Transcript 9/19/2016, #2 Exhibit Transcript 5/1/17, #3 Exhibit Transcript 5/2/17, #4 Exhibit Transcript 5/3/17, #5 Exhibit Transcript 5/4/17, #6 Exhibit Transcript 5/8/17, #7 Exhibit Transcript 5/9/17, #8 Exhibit Transcript 5/10/17, #9 Exhibit Transcript 5/11/17, #10 Exhibit Transcript 5/12/17, #11 Exhibit Transcript 5/15/17, #12 Exhibit Transcript 5/17/17, #13 Exhibit Transcript 6/5/17, #14 Exhibit Transcript 1/13/19, #15 Exhibit Transcript 2/1/19)(Bocian, Thomas) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE/ANSWER to Petition by Matthew Divris. (Bocian, Thomas) |
| Filing 20 STATEMENT OF COUNSEL of Respondent Regarding Existence of Victim by Matthew Divris. (Bocian, Thomas) |
| Filing 19 Opposition re #10 MOTION for Order to Relieve the Parties of the Conference Requirement in Local Rule 7.1 filed by Jorge Adames-Garcia. (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 18 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jorge Adames-Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit)(Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE pursuant to LR 5.2 by Jorge Adames-Garcia re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). (Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jorge Adames-Garcia.(Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jorge Adames-Garcia.(Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 14 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered ALLOWED #10 MOTION for Order to Relieve the Parties of the Conference Requirement in Local Rule 7.1. (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 13 Copy re 12 Order on Motion for Extension of Time mailed to Jorge Adames-Garcia on 7/13/21. (Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 12 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to August 13, 2021 to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to August 13, 2021 to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Matthew Divris.(Bocian, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Order to Relieve the Parties of the Conference Requirement in Local Rule 7.1 by Matthew Divris.(Bocian, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas E. Bocian on behalf of Matthew Divris (Bocian, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 1BST085425 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Barbosa, Nilsa) |
| Filing 7 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 6 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. The motion (Docket No. 4) to appoint counsel and the motion (Docket No. 3) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED without prejudice to renewal with a copy of petitioners prison account statement. (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jorge Adames-Garcia. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jorge Adames-Garcia. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Jorge Adames-Garcia in Support re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254, filed by Jorge Adames-Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Baker, Casey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adames-Garcia v. Divris | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Matthew Divris | |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Bocian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jorge Adames-Garcia | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
