LEE v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
| KOEUN LEE |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2021cv11067 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Donald L Cabell |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #23 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to December 14, 2021 to File Answer to #1 Complaint, in light of USCIS's agreement to re-open Plaintiff's Form I-485 Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (I-485 application), which will require additional time for the adjudication process to be completed and will result in a new decision on Plaintiff's I-485 application. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. Case stayed. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 23 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,,, by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.(Brizius, Erin) |
| Filing 22 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #21 Motion for Extension of Time to extend the deadline for defendant United States to file a responsive pleading for thirty days (30) days, fromJuly 16, 2021, to August 16, 2021. (Zierk, Marsha) |
| Filing 21 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to August 16, 2021 to File a Response by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.(Brizius, Erin) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin E. Brizius on behalf of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Brizius, Erin) |
| Filing 19 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Michael E. Piston. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 18 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case RE-Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 17 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (David-Dembrowsky, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Michael E. Piston Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-8851328 by KOEUN LEE. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael Piston)(David-Dembrowsky, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 15 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Notification forms indicating whether or not a party has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge have not been received in the Clerk's Office. The submission of the form is mandatory. Completed forms shall be filed promptly. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Russo, Noreen) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth M. David-Dembrowsky on behalf of KOEUN LEE (David-Dembrowsky, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 12 Case transferred in from District of Michigan Eastern; Case Number 2:21-cv-11008. |
Filing 11
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to District of Massachusetts. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (TTho)
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Transfer Case by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Piston, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #6 MOTION to Change Venue filed by KOEUN LEE. (Response due by 6/22/2021) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Change Venue by KOEUN LEE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Piston, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF HEARING BY VIDEO CONFERENCE on #6 MOTION to Change Venue. Motion Hearing set for 8/26/2021 at 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox |Zoom Webinar Information: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1609896445?pwd=OW9WZ2dVRnVHRUpjNzNMSjdxR1FCUT09 Passcode: 538895 Or One tap mobile : US: +16692545252,,1609896445# or +16468287666,,1609896445#| (JMcC) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Change Venue by UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, District Court Caseloads, March 2020) (Carty, James) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by James J. Carty on behalf of UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. (Carty, James) |
| Filing 4 ERRATA Sheet by KOEUN LEE Containing Corrected Exhibit A to Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Piston, Michael) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (TTho) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES* (TTho) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by KOEUN LEE against UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8450565 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Summons USCIS Attorney General, #4 Exhibit Summons USCIS Civil Process Clerk, #5 Exhibit Summons USCIS Office of Chief Counsel) (Piston, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LEE v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
| Represented By: | James J. Carty |
| Represented By: | Erin E. Brizius |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KOEUN LEE | |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Piston |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth M. David-Dembrowsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
