Williams et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Neil Stutts and Whitney Williams |
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC |
1:2021cv11103 |
July 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
F Dennis Saylor |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Neil Stutts, Whitney Williams (Parfitt, Michelle) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF MDL CASE OPENED, Direct file in the District of Massachusetts; Williams, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. In Re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2657. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8844980 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Neil Stutts, Whitney Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Category Sheets)(Parfitt, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.