Walters v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
Jimmy Walters |
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc. |
1:2021cv11225 |
July 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Allison D Burroughs |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Stephen C. Matthews Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-8880603 by AngioDynamics, Inc., Navilyst Medical, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Godin, Cortney) |
Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (McDonagh, Christina) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Navilyst Medical, Inc.. (Godin, Cortney) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by AngioDynamics, Inc.. (Godin, Cortney) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AngioDynamics, Inc., Navilyst Medical, Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8879724 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Action Cover Sheet, #4 Category Form)(Godin, Cortney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.