Clermont v. Town of Tisbury et al
| Danielle Clermont |
| Town of Tisbury, James Rogers, Chief Daniel Hanavan, Jeremie Rogers and Max Sherman |
| 1:2021cv11228 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Indira Talwani |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Daniel Hanavan, James Rogers, Jeremie Rogers, Max Sherman, Town of Tisbury. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jared S. Burke on behalf of Danielle Clermont (Burke, Jared) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8880141 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Danielle Clermont. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Category Form)(Burke, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
