Rossi v. Verizon Communications Inc.
Plaintiff: Janeda R Rossi
Defendant: Verizon Communications Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv11389
Filed: August 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Richard G Stearns
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2021 Filing 15 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Vimal K. Shah. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Pacho, Arnold)
October 21, 2021 Filing 14 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Randi F. Knepper. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold)
October 20, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Randi F. Knepper Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9017309 by Verizon Communications Inc..(Russman, David)
October 20, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Vimal K. Shah Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9017223 by Verizon Communications Inc..(Russman, David)
October 20, 2021 Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Russman, David)
October 15, 2021 Filing 10 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Defendants Motion to Dismiss #7 . The Opposition to defendant Verizon Communications Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss was due on October 8, 2021. On October 14, 2021, plaintiff Janeda Rossi, through counsel and without any factual assertion of excusable neglect, asked for an extension until November 28, 2021, to respond to the motion. While it is not this court's practice to permit counsel to extend time when a request is made beyond the original response period, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A)-(B), the court nonetheless will allow plaintiff until November 5, 2021 (6 weeks from the filing of the motion) to respond. SO ORDERED. (Zierk, Marsha)
October 14, 2021 Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Oppoiiton to Defendants Motion to Dismiss to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Extend to 11/28/2021 by Janeda R Rossi. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Franzese, Joseph)
September 24, 2021 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit)(Russman, David)
September 24, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Verizon Communications Inc..(Russman, David)
September 14, 2021 Filing 6 STATE COURT Record. (Russman, David)
August 31, 2021 Filing 5 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to September 24, 2021 to Respond to the Complaint. (Pacho, Arnold)
August 30, 2021 Filing 4 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Verizon Communications Inc..(Russman, David)
August 25, 2021 Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email.(Burgos, Sandra)
August 25, 2021 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary)
August 25, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Verizon Communications Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8918228 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exh A, #2 Exh B, #3 Exh C, #4 Exh D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Category Sheet, #7 Certificate of Service)(Russman, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rossi v. Verizon Communications Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janeda R Rossi
Represented By: Joseph P. Franzese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Communications Inc.
Represented By: David P. Russman
Represented By: Randi F. Knepper
Represented By: Vimal K. Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?