Sack v. W8 Media Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Benjamin Sack
Defendant: W8 Media Corporation, Hubrick Limited, Etaia AS, Odinson Corporation and Heimdal Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv11413
Filed: August 27, 2021
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Indira Talwani
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2021 Filing 16 Case transferred to the Central District of California. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet sent electronically to Clerk in that district. (Kelly, Danielle)
October 18, 2021 Filing 15 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered: The Joint Motion to Transfer Venue to the Central District of California #14 is GRANTED and the Motion to Dismiss #10 is DENIED as moot. The clerk shall transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Please see attached. (Kelly, Danielle)
October 13, 2021 Filing 14 Joint MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Central District of California. by Hubrick Limited, W8 Media Corporation.(Siegel, Jeffrey)
September 24, 2021 Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Will Brody in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative Transfer filed by Hubrick Limited, W8 Media Corporation. (Siegel, Jeffrey)
September 24, 2021 Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative Transfer David Williams filed by Hubrick Limited, W8 Media Corporation. (Siegel, Jeffrey)
September 24, 2021 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative Transfer filed by Hubrick Limited, W8 Media Corporation. (Siegel, Jeffrey)
September 24, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative Transfer by Hubrick Limited, W8 Media Corporation.(Siegel, Jeffrey)
September 24, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Scott Siegel on behalf of Hubrick Limited, W8 Media Corporation (Siegel, Jeffrey)
September 16, 2021 Filing 8 STATE COURT Record. (Scott, Catherine)
September 3, 2021 Filing 7 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Assented to Motion for Extension of Time to 9/24/21 to File Responsive Pleading. (Kelly, Danielle)
September 2, 2021 Filing 6 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 9/24/21 to File Responsive Pleading by Hubrick Limited, W8 Media Corporation.(Scott, Catherine) Modified on 9/2/2021: Corrected event type (Kelly, Danielle).
August 27, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine M. Scott on behalf of W8 Media Corporation (Scott, Catherine)
August 27, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Scott Siegel on behalf of W8 Media Corporation (Siegel, Jeffrey)
August 27, 2021 Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
August 27, 2021 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary)
August 27, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by W8 Media Corporation ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8922376 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint), #2 Exhibit B (Notice of Filing), #3 Exhibit C (Notice to Counsel, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Category Form)(Scott, Catherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sack v. W8 Media Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin Sack
Represented By: Thomas W. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: W8 Media Corporation
Represented By: Jeffrey Scott Siegel
Represented By: Catherine M. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hubrick Limited
Represented By: Jeffrey Scott Siegel
Represented By: Catherine M. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Etaia AS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Odinson Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heimdal Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?