Pavlik et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
John Pavlik and Catherine Pavlik |
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation |
1:2021cv11494 |
September 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Indira Talwani |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Resetting Hearing: Case Management Conference set for September 28, 2021 is RESET to November 15, 2021 04:00 PM in Remote Proceeding : Boston before Judge Indira Talwani.Counsel of record: To gain access to the hearing, please register at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html. (Counsel shall select "Public" as 'Sign-up Type'. Counsel shall enter Display Name and telephone number, for video access.)This hearing will be conducted by video conference. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the session's courtroom deputy as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html.For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the Court's general orders and public notices available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov.Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violations of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, or denial of entry to future hearings, and such other sanctions, including for contempt of court, as may be deemed appropriate or necessary by the court.Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02768-IT et al. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #6 Master Long Form Complaint by Howmedica Osteonics Corporation. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 6 MASTER LONG FORM COMPLAINT against Howmedica Osteonics Corporation. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 5 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MDL Orders No. 1-13 (Attachments: #1 Case Management Order No. 1-9, #2 Protective Order, #3 ESI Order, #4 Fact Sheet Implementation Order, #5 Order Aiding Private Settlement, #6 Orders Extending Discovery Stay) (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Howmedica Osteonics Corporation. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Dore, Samantha) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF MDL CASE OPENED, Direct file in the District of Massachusetts; Pavlik, et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation. In Re: Stryker Orthopaedics LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Howmedica Osteonics Corporation Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8943630 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Catherine Pavlik, John Pavlik. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Flowers, Peter) Modified on 9/13/2021 (Dore, Samantha). Changed description name. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.