Gillis v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
| Christopher Gillis |
| U.S. Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2021cv11528 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| William G Young |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered finding as moot #17 Motion for Extension of Time to 7 days after Remand Decision issued to File Answer or other Responsive Pleading by U.S. Bank, N.A. Motion to dismiss filed 11/8/2021. (Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 20 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : Motion Hearing set for 12/2/2021 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 18 before Judge William G. Young. (Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Support re #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Sprague, Stephanie) |
| Filing 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by U.S. Bank, N.A..(Sprague, Stephanie) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to 7 days after Remand Decision issued to File Answer or other Responsive Pleading by U.S. Bank, N.A..(Sprague, Stephanie) |
| Filing 16 Opposition re #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit in support of opposition)(Sprague, Stephanie) |
| Filing 15 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court : Motion Hearing set for 12/2/2021 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 18 before Judge William G. Young. (Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 14 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or otherwise plead. U.S. Bank, N.A. responsive pleading due on or before 11/8/2021. (Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Christopher Gillis. (Choi, Chelsea) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Christopher Gillis.(Choi, Chelsea) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise plead filed by Christopher Gillis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Morneau, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 10 STATE COURT Record. (Guillory Tadesse, Krystle) |
| Filing 9 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Thomas J. Cunningham. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Thomas J. Cunningham Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-8975499 by U.S. Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas J. Cunningham)(Guillory Tadesse, Krystle) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise plead by U.S. Bank, N.A..(Guillory Tadesse, Krystle) |
| Filing 6 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Sprague on behalf of U.S. Bank, N.A. (Sprague, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by U.S. Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent U.S. Bancorp for U.S. Bank, N.A... (Guillory Tadesse, Krystle) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Krystle S. Guillory Tadesse on behalf of U.S. Bank, N.A. (Guillory Tadesse, Krystle) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by U.S. Bank, N.A. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8952769 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet and Category Form)(Guillory Tadesse, Krystle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gillis v. U.S. Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Gillis | |
| Represented By: | Chelsea K. Choi |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey S. Morneau |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Krystle S. Guillory Tadesse |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Sprague |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. Cunningham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
