Logue v. The RAND Corporation
| Sheila Logue |
| The RAND Corporation |
| 1:2021cv11672 |
| October 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Ackerstein, Michael) |
| Filing 9 JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference . (Ackerstein, Michael) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint Answer and Additional Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by The RAND Corporation.(Silveira, Alison) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SET FOR 12/14/2021 09:30 AM in Remote Proceeding : Boston before Judge Patti B. Saris. This hearing will be conducted by VIDEO CONFERENCE. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the session's courtroom deputy as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html. For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the Court's general orders and public notices available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov.(Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 6 STATE COURT Record. (Silveira, Alison) |
| Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The RAND Corporation. (Silveira, Alison) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Alison Hickey Silveira on behalf of The RAND Corporation (Silveira, Alison) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The RAND Corporation ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9005619 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal (Norfolk Superior Court), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Local Category Form)(Silveira, Alison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Logue v. The RAND Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sheila Logue | |
| Represented By: | Michael B. Ackerstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The RAND Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Alison Hickey Silveira |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
