Liang v. Milady Beauty Salon LLC et al
Plaintiff: Yingzi Liang
Defendant: Milady Beauty Salon LLC doing business as BB Beauty Salon and Zhong Xia
Case Number: 1:2021cv11778
Filed: November 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: William G Young
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2021 Filing 13 REPORT on the filing/termination of copyright case . (Walsh, Christopher)
December 29, 2021 Filing 12 Milady & Xia Zhong ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand of Liang, First COUNTERCLAIM Against Liang against Zhong Xia by Zhong Xia.(Lee, Mary)
December 8, 2021 Filing 11 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Extension allowed to December 30, 2021, otherwise denied. No further continuances. (Gaudet, Jennifer)
December 7, 2021 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Mary K. Y. Lee re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Milady Beauty Salon LLC. (Lee, Mary) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/8/2021: #1 Exhibit 1) (Paine, Matthew). (Main Document 10 replaced on 12/8/2021) (Paine, Matthew). Modified on 12/8/2021 to Correct Docket Text and Separate Exhibits As Counsel Incorrectly Filed the Affidavit and Exhibits as One Long PDF (Paine, Matthew).
December 7, 2021 Filing 9 First Opposition re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Yingzi Liang. (Walsh, Christopher) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/8/2021: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit F, #3 Exhibit H, #4 Exhibit I, #5 Exhibit J) (Paine, Matthew). (Main Document 9 replaced on 12/8/2021) (Paine, Matthew). Modified on 12/8/2021 to Correct Docket Text and Separate Exhibits As Counsel Incorrectly Filed the Opposition and Exhibits as One Long PDF (Paine, Matthew).
December 6, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to February 6, 2022 by Milady Beauty Salon LLC.(Lee, Mary) Modified on 12/7/2021 to Correct Docket Text and CM/ECF Filing Event As Counsel Filed the Motion Under the Wrong Event in CM/ECF (Paine, Matthew). (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/7/2021: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Paine, Matthew). (Main Document 8 replaced on 12/7/2021) (Paine, Matthew).
December 6, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary K. Y. Lee on behalf of Milady Beauty Salon LLC (Lee, Mary)
December 2, 2021 Filing 6 Notice of Service of Process filed by Yingzi Liang. Individual(s)/Entities served: Milady Beauty Salon LLC d/b/a/ BB Beauty Salon. (Walsh, Christopher)
December 2, 2021 Filing 5 Notice of Service of Process filed by Yingzi Liang. Individual(s)/Entities served: Zhong Xia. (Walsh, Christopher)
November 2, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kelly, Danielle)
November 2, 2021 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary)
November 2, 2021 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Report on Filing or Determination re: Copyright - AO 121. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents - Report on the filing/termination of copyright case. (Kelly, Danielle)
November 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9038121 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Yingzi Liang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Copyright Registration, #2 Exhibit Copyright Infringement, #3 Exhibit Requests to Take Down, other unauthorized use, #4 Exhibit Settlement Agreement, #5 Exhibit Settlement Amount and Bad Check, #6 Exhibit Demand Letter Receipts, #7 Exhibit Damage to Business, #8 Exhibit Defendant Incorporation, #9 Affidavit Affidavit of Authentication)(Walsh, Christopher) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/2/2021: #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Category Form, #12 Proposed Summons) (Kelly, Danielle). (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/2/2021) (Kelly, Danielle).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liang v. Milady Beauty Salon LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yingzi Liang
Represented By: Christopher P. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Milady Beauty Salon LLC doing business as BB Beauty Salon
Represented By: Mary K. Y. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zhong Xia
Represented By: Mary K. Y. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?