Mercado v. Kijakazi

Plaintiff: Rosalyn Mercado
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2021cv12033
Filed: December 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Denise J Casper
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2022 Filing 7 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added David F. Chermol. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McDonagh, Christina)
December 27, 2021 Filing 6 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Currie, Haley)
December 14, 2021 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary)
December 13, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of David F. Chermol Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9096420 by Rosalyn Mercado. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Ferrari, Louis)
December 13, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Louis David Ferrari on behalf of Rosalyn Mercado (Ferrari, Louis)
December 13, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rosalyn Mercado. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ferrari, Louis)
December 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Rosalyn Mercado. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Proposed Summons OSAO, #4 Proposed Summons USAG, #5 Proposed Summons OGC)(Ferrari, Louis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mercado v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosalyn Mercado
Represented By: Louis David Ferrari
Represented By: David F. Chermol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Christopher A. Michaels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?