Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kliushin et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Vladislav Kliushin, Nikolai Rumiantcev, Ivan Yermakov, Vladislav Klyushin, Nikolay Rumyantcev, Mikhail Irzak, Igor Sladkov and Ivan Ermakov |
| 1:2021cv12088 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Donald L Cabell |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Notification forms indicating whether or not a party has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge have not been received in the Clerk's Office. The submission of the form is mandatory. Completed forms should be filed promptly. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Russo, Noreen) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION for Service by Publication and Email filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Megan Bergstrom, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9)(Connor, James) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Service by Publication and Email by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Connor, James) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Securities and Exchange Commission. Vladislav Kliushin waiver sent on 12/22/2021, answer due 2/22/2022. (Mendel, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Maksim Nemtsev on behalf of Vladislav Kliushin (Nemtsev, Maksim) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James Patrick Connor on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission (Connor, James) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Mikhail Irzak, Vladislav Kliushin, Nikolai Rumiantcev, Igor Sladkov, Ivan Yermakov. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee Status: US Government), filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to Kliushin, #3 Summons to Rumiantcev, #4 Summons to Irzak, #5 Summons to Sladkov, #6 Summons to Yermakov)(Mendel, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/20/2021: #7 Category Form) (Warnock, Douglas). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
