Monteiro et al v. The Children's Hospital Corporation et al
Adilson Monteiro, Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan and Brian Minsk |
The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee and Does No. 1-20 |
1:2022cv10069 |
January 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Angel Kelley |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM in Support re #59 MOTION to Certify Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) filed by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 59 MOTION to Certify Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee.(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 58 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING #57 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to April 19, 2023 to File Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 57 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to April 19, 2023 to File Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee.(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 56 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Defendants #27 motion to dismiss is DENIED. As a threshold matter, Plaintiffs have standing to pursue their claims. Defendants argue that Plaintiffs cannot challenge funds in which they did not invest. [Dkt. 28 at 19]. That argument has been rejected by several courts. See, e.g., Velazquez v. Mass. Fin. Servs. Co., 320 F. Supp. 3d 252, 257 (D. Mass. 2018). Here, Plaintiffs allege that they invested in four specific target date funds and Defendants actions as to those funds (and others) affected the Plan as a whole, including recordkeeping fees. [See Dkt. 1 at 5-6]. That is sufficient to establish Article III standing at this juncture. Defendants also argue that Plaintiffs lack standing because they do not allege that the funds in which they did invest underperformed any of the comparator funds during the period Plaintiffs held those investments. [Dkt. 28 at 20]. Such an allegation is not required to establish standing here. Plaintiffs allegations that they each maintained an investment through the Plan in specific target date funds [d]uring the Class Period that were subject to the excessive recordkeeping and administrative costs alleged below [Dkt. 1 at 1, 9-12] were sufficient to claim an injury in fact, as they allege that they personally paid excessive fees in connection with their own investments, In re Biogen, Inc. ERISA Litig., No. 21-CV-11325-DJC, 2021 WL 3116331, at *4 (D. Mass. July 22, 2021).Viewed as a whole, Plaintiffs complaint states a plausible claim of breach of fiduciary duties. See Garca-Cataln v. United States, 734 F.3d 100, 103 (1st Cir. 2013); see also Sellers v. Trus. of Coll., -- F. Supp. 3d --, No. 22-CV-10912-WGY, 2022 WL 17968685, at *1 (D. Mass. Dec. 27, 2022). The duty of prudence requires ERISA fiduciaries to act with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims. 29 U.S.C. 1104(a)(1)(B). The duty of loyalty requires ERISA fiduciaries to discharge [their] duties with respect to a plan solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries. 29 U.S.C. 1104(a)(1)(A). There is a continuing duty to monitor trust investments and remove imprudent ones. Tibble v. Edison Intl, 575 U.S. 523, 529 (2015). Plaintiffs allege several facts in support of their claim that Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by offering actively-managed target date funds (the Active Suite) as investment options. Plaintiffs compare the Active Suite to passively-managed target date funds (the Index Suite) offered by the same company and to other similarly-sized, actively-managed target date funds offered by various companies, such as by providing data on annualized returns. [Dkt. 1 at 60-82]. Plaintiffs also allege that Defendants never undertook a review of the performance of the funds comprising the Active Suite and that several of the funds lacked a sufficient performance history to enable fiduciaries to perform a meaningful analysis. [Id. at 69-70]; see Turner v. Schneider Elec. Holdings, Inc., 530 F. Supp. 3d 127, 133-34 (D. Mass. 2021) (denying motion to dismiss where the plaintiffs alleged, in part, that the funds had insufficient performance histories upon which they could be evaluated). Plaintiffs further claim that Defendants failed to offer available, lower-cost share classes for many of the Plans funds. [Dkt. 1 at 84-85]; see Sellers, 2022 WL 17968685, at *13 (denying a motion to dismiss where the plaintiffs included non-speculative allegations that cheaper share classes were available); Brown v. Mitre Corp., No. 22-CV-10976-DJC, 2023 WL 2383772, at *7 (D. Mass. Mar. 6, 2023); see also Davis v. Salesforce.com, Inc., No. 21-15867, 2022 WL 1055557, at *1 (9th Cir. Apr. 8, 2022) (holding that allegations that more expensive share classes chosen by [the] [d]efendants were the same in every respect other than price [as] their less expensive counterparts. . . plausibly suggest that defendants acted imprudently by failing to switch to lower-cost alternatives). Plaintiffs buttress their claims of underperformance by describing various articles that were critical of the Active Suite and by noting net outflows from the Active Suite to other investments. [Dkt. 1 at 74 & n.13, 75-76]; see In re Biogen, 2021 WL 3116331, at *6. Plaintiffs also allege Defendants allowed recordkeeping and administrative fees that far exceeded the reasonable market rate, listing the average per person fees paid by seven other similarly sized and comparable defined contribution plans. [Dkt. 1 at 52, 54-56]; see Brown, 2023 WL 2383772, at *3-5. Taking into account the totality of the circumstances, Plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient factual allegations to state a plausible claim against [Defendants] for breach of the duty of prudence as a result of unreasonable fees and/or imprudent investment options. Sellers, 2022 WL 17968685, at *14. Even if there are alternative, reasonable explanations for Defendants conduct, at this stage of the litigation, the facts alleged provide a sound basis for comparisona meaningful benchmarksuggesting that the Active Suite underperformed and that the Plan was needlessly more expensive than similar plans, which supports a plausible claim that the Defendants actions breached their fiduciary duties. See Davis v. Washington Univ. St. Louis, 960 F.3d 478, 484 (8th Cir. 2022). Because the remaining claims are derivative of the breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim, they also survive dismissal. [See Dkt. 28 at 18 n.21]; see also Kruger v. Novant Health, Inc., 131 F. Supp. 3d 470, 474-80 (M.D.N.C. 2015) (denying a motion to dismiss where the allegations of the defendants breach of the duty of loyalty were tied to allegations of their breach of the duty of prudence). (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 55 Fourth Notice of Supplemental Authorities re #27 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of standing, #53 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authorities in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Tullgren and Hall Transcript, #2 Exhibit 2 - Jones v. DISH Network Corp., #3 Exhibit 3 - Beldock v. Microsoft Corp.)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 54 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING #53 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authorities in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order) - in the caption of the document. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 53 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authorities in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Supplemental Authorities)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 52 Third Notice of Supplemental Authorities re #27 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of standing, #50 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Third Notice of Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 51 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The defendants #50 motion for leave to file a third notice of supplemental authority is GRANTED. The defendants shall file their notice within three days of this order. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 50 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Third Notice of Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 49 REPLY to Response to #47 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Notice of Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 48 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The defendants #47 motion for leave to file a reply is granted. The defendants shall filed their reply within three days of this order. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 47 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Notice of Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 46 Response by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro to #42 Notice of Supplemental Authorities . (Rubinow, Laurie) |
Filing 45 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The plaintiffs #44 consented-to motion for leave to a file a response is GRANTED. The response shall be filed by October 14, 2022. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order) - in the caption of the document. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 44 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Response to Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority)(Rubinow, Laurie) |
Filing 43 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by Gabrielle P. Kelerchian (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kelerchian, Gabrielle) |
Filing 42 Notice of Supplemental Authorities re #40 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 41 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Defendants' #40 motion for leave to file is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their notice within three days of this order. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Currie, Haley) |
Filing 40 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Supplemental Authority)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 39 Notice of Supplemental Authorities re #37 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority In Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 38 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Defendants #37 Consented to Motion for Leave to File is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their notice within three days of this order. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order) - in the caption of the document. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 37 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority In Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and A.1)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 36 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #33 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Stephanie R. Reiss. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 35 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #32 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Jeremy P. Blumenfeld. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 34 REPLY re #27 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of standing filed by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Engelman, Keri) Modified on 5/13/2022 to correct docket entry. (Lara, Miguel). |
Filing 33 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Stephanie R. Reiss Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9300017 by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stephanie R. Reiss)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 32 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Jeremy P. Blumenfeld Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9299990 by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeremy P. Blumenfeld)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 31 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #30 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Defendant's Reply is due May 12, 2022, and is limited to 10 pages; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 30 MOTION for Leave to File Reply by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee.(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #27 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of standing filed by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Roddy, John) |
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM in Support re #27 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of standing filed by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6)(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 27 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of standing by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee.(Engelman, Keri) |
Filing 26 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #25 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 7, 2022 to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' #1 Complaint. Defendants' answer due April 7, 2022. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 25 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 7, 2022 to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee.(Engelman, Keri) Modified ECF event on 3/3/2022 (Pacho, Arnold). |
Filing 24 SUMMONS Returned Executed The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation served on 2/17/2022, answer due 3/10/2022; The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee served on 2/17/2022, answer due 3/10/2022. (Roberts, John) |
Filing 23 SUMMONS Returned Executed The Children's Hospital Corporation served on 2/14/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (Roberts, John) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by John C. Roberts on behalf of Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro (Roberts, John) |
Filing 21 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Donald R. Reavey. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 20 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Gabrielle P. Kelerchian. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 19 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Mark K. Gyandoh. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 18 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Laurie Rubinow. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 17 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Kolin C. Tang. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 16 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added James E. Miller. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 15 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added James C. Shah. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 14 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added John C. Roberts. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 13 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Alec J. Berin. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Donald R. Reavey Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9174440 by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Donald R. Reavey)(Roddy, John) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Gabrielle P. Kelerchian Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9174433 by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Gabrielle P. Kelerchian)(Roddy, John) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Mark K. Gyandoh Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9174414 by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark K. Gyandoh)(Roddy, John) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Laurie Rubinow Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9174403 by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Laurie Rubinow)(Roddy, John) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Kolin C. Tang Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9174400 by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Kolin C. Tang)(Roddy, John) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of James E. Miller Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9174389 by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Certification of James E. Miller)(Roddy, John) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of James C. Shah Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9174380 by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Certification of James C. Shah)(Roddy, John) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of John C. Roberts Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9174369 by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Certification of John C. Roberts)(Roddy, John) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Alec J. Berin Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9174359 by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Alec J. Berin)(Roddy, John) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Board of Directors of the Children's Hospital Corporation, The Children's Hospital Corporation Retirement Committee, Does No. 1-20, The Children's Hospital Corporation Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9142771 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Karen Ginsburg, Jason Lutan, Brian Minsk, Adilson Monteiro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Roddy, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.