Santiago v. Social Security Administration
| Rigoberto Santiago |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv10360 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Rya W Zobel |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF (instructions for service by USMS & copy of LR 4.1). (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 7 Judge Rya W. Zobel: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting Second Motion #6 for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue a summons. The plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint and summons in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 4.1 within 90 days of the date the summons is issued. The plaintiff may elect to have service made by the United States Marshal Service. If so asked by the plaintiff, the United States Marshals Service shall complete service as directed by the plaintiff with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. The plaintiff is responsible for providing the United States Marshals Service all papers for service. The USM-285 form may be found at www.usmarshals.gov/process/usm285.pdf and is also available from the Clerk upon request.(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 6 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rigoberto Santiago.(Valentine, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 Judge Rya W. Zobel: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered on Motion #2 for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is clear from plaintiff's application that he is without income. However, plaintiff failed to answer Question 4 on his application and it appears that his answers to Questions 5 and 8 are "Home." If plaintiff owns a home, he must describe the property, its approximate value, the amount owned and to whom payable. Because of the incomplete disclosures, plaintiffs motion is DENIED without prejudice to filing a renewed application that answers each question and includes the financial information of any supporting relative or friend. Fridman v. City of New York, 195 F. Supp. 2d 534, 537 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (In assessing an application to proceed in forma pauperis, a court may consider the resources that the applicant has or can get from those who ordinarily provide the applicant with the necessities of life, such as from a spouse, parent, adult sibling or other next friend. (quoting Williams v. Spencer, 455 F. Supp. 205, 20809 (D. Md. 1978)), Plaintiff's renewed application must be filed on or before April 15, 2022.(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 4 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Rya W. Zobel assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rigoberto Santiago.(Valentine, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Rigoberto Santiago. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Local Category Sheet)(Valentine, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
