Cotter v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
| James M Cotter |
| Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv10393 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference: Scheduling Conference set for 6/8/2022 03:15 PM in Courtroom 13 (Remote only) before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin. This hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the session's courtroom deputy as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html. For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the Court's general orders and public notices available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov. (Attachments: #1 Sample Order, #2 Standing Order re Summary Judgment Motions)(Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 5 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: New Civil Cases General Procedural ORDER entered. (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.(Hamilton, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9224569 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by James M Cotter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS044, #2 Category Form)(Shenoy, Praven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cotter v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James M Cotter | |
| Represented By: | Praven Shenoy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Joseph M. Hamilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
