Plausky v. Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Robert Plausky
Defendant: Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank N.A.
Case Number: 1:2022cv10445
Filed: March 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Denise J Casper
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Filing 8 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to 6/19/22 (Hourihan, Lisa)
May 18, 2022 Filing 7 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to June 19, 2022 to File Responsive Pleading by Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A..(Carr, Peter)
April 20, 2022 Filing 6 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to May 19, 2022 to File Responsive Pleading by Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A. (Hourihan, Lisa)
April 19, 2022 Filing 5 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to May 19, 2022 to File Responsive Pleading by Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A..(Carr, Peter)
March 24, 2022 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Credit Suisse (USA), Inc., Corporate Parent SPS Holding Corp. for Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc... (Carr, Peter)
March 24, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by U.S. Bank N.A. identifying Corporate Parent U.S. Bancorp for U.S. Bank N.A... (Carr, Peter)
March 24, 2022 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary)
March 24, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9241501 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Local Category Form)(Carr, Peter) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/24/2022: #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D. And Main Document 1 replaced detached from exhibits.) (de Oliveira, Flaviana).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Plausky v. Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Plausky
Represented By: Todd S. Dion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc.
Represented By: Peter Francis Carr, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bank N.A.
Represented By: Peter Francis Carr, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?