Li et al v. Larsen et al
| Henry Li and Metis Center, LLC |
| Stephen Larsen and Interlearn, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv10495 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| George A OToole |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Parties, filed by Henry Li.(Bappert, Stephen) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to June 17, 2022 to Respond to Amended Complaint by Interlearn, Inc..(Tumilty, John) |
| Filing 13 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #12 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to May 19, 2022 to File Answer to Complaint, #1 Complaint, Interlearn, Inc. answer due 5/19/2022; Stephen Larsen answer due 5/19/2022. (Lyness, Paul) |
| Filing 12 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to May 19, 2022 to File Answer to Complaint by Interlearn, Inc., Stephen Larsen.(Tumilty, John) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Paige K. Zacharakis on behalf of Interlearn, Inc., Stephen Larsen (Zacharakis, Paige) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John J. Tumilty on behalf of Interlearn, Inc., Stephen Larsen (Tumilty, John) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by John J. Tumilty on behalf of Interlearn, Inc., Stephen Larsen (Tumilty, John) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Stephen Larsen served on 4/21/2022, answer due 5/12/2022. (Roberts, Greil) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Interlearn, Inc. served on 4/7/2022, answer due 4/28/2022. (Roberts, Greil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen Bappert on behalf of Henry Li, Metis Center, LLC (Bappert, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Stephen C. Bappert. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Stephen C. Bappert Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9257851 by Henry Li, Metis Center, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Roberts, Greil) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Interlearn, Inc., Stephen Larsen. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge George A. OToole, Jr assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Interlearn, Inc., Stephen Larsen Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9257553 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Henry Li, Metis Center, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(Roberts, Greil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
