Licht v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
| Amy Licht |
| Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co. and Organon, LLC |
| 1:2022cv10515 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Allison D Burroughs |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly Lewis Beck on behalf of Amy Licht (Beck, Kimberly) |
| Filing 26 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #25 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Kimberly L. Beck. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5.3, local counsel shall also file an appearance in this matter. Further, local counsel shall review all filings and shall personally appear in Court for any hearings or conferences, unless expressly excused by the Court for good cause.(McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 25 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Kimberly Beck Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9322302 by Amy Licht. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Affidavit)(Bliss, Paula) |
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to #13 MOTION to Dismiss REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., ORGANON & CO., AND ORGANON, LLCS MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., Organon, LLC. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 23 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #22 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Folan, Karen) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to File A Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., Organon, LLC.(Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 21 Opposition re #13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Amy Licht. (Bliss, Paula) |
| Filing 20 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs added. Judge Indira Talwani no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 19 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. ORDER OF RECUSAL.(MacDonald, Gail) |
| Filing 18 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Indira Talwani added. Judge Richard G. Stearns no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 17 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The factual disparities among individual plaintiffs' cases -- broad differences in the time periods and frequencies during which plaintiffs were prescribed SINGULAR or its generic (dating from 2000 to 2020), the intervening changes in the contents of the published warnings during that same time span, the predictable differences on issues of individual damages and causation -- fails the related civil cases standard set out in D. Mass. LR 40.1. (There are no circumstances that the court can envision that would allow a joint trial of the cases filed thus far). Accordingly, the court will return all but the first-filed case, Baiona v. Merck & Co., Inc., 22-10474-RGS, to the Clerk to be redrawn. The court will, once the cases are reassigned, entertain a motion for consolidation of the cases for purposes of discovery related to common factual issues, as well as issues that are purely a matter of law, on agreement of the parties and the district court judges to whom the cases are assigned. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-10474-RGS et al.(Zierk, Marsha) |
| Filing 16 STATE COURT Record. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., Organon, LLC re 11 Order, Defendants L.R. 40.1(g)(5)(b) Certification. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., Organon, LLC. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., Organon, LLC.(Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle M. Byers on behalf of Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., Organon, LLC (Byers, Michelle) |
| Filing 11 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. To file this as a case related to 22-10474, removal counsel is required to file a certification pursuant to D. Mass. L.R. 40.1(g)(5)(B) that this matter meets the definition of Related Case. See L.R. 40.1(g). The certification must be filed no later than April 14, 2022. The court notes that common questions of law and some of the same parties are insufficient for related case status. L.R. 40.1(g)(3).(Zierk, Marsha) |
| Filing 10 Request for Judicial Notice Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendants Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., and Organon, LLCs Notice of Removal and Removal of Action by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., Organon, LLC. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Organon & Co.. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. identifying Corporate Parent Merck & Co., Inc. for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp... (Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Organon, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Organon & Co. for Organon, LLC.. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Merck & Co., Inc.. (Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., Organon, LLC Defendants Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp., Organon & Co., and Organon LLCs Notice of Compliance With 28 U.S.C 1446(D) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Notice of Removal)(Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 4 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #1 Notice of Removal, Declaration of Michelle I. Schaffer in Support of Defendants Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., and Organon, LLCs Notice of Removal Under 28 U.S.C. 1441(B). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit New Jersey State Treasurers Status Report for Merck & Co., Inc., #3 Exhibit Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.s Business Entity Summary, #4 Exhibit New Jersey State Treasurers Status Report for Organon & Co., #5 Exhibit Business Entity Summary for Organon, LLC)(Schaffer, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., Organon, LLC ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9263920 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category)(Schaffer, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
