Dunn et al v. Cardona et al
Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart and Brittany Williams |
Secretary Miguel Cardona, U.S. Department of Education and Miguel Cardona |
1:2022cv10615 |
April 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
William G Young |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyra A. Taylor on behalf of Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams (Taylor, Kyra) |
Filing 24 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting re #23 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to July 20, 2022 to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. Miguel Cardona answer/response due 7/20/2022; U.S. Department of Education answer/response due 7/20/2022. (Paine, Matthew) |
Filing 23 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to July 20, 2022 to File Answer by Miguel Cardona, U.S. Department of Education. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kirschner, Adam) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by Annapurna Balakrishna (Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Kirschner on behalf of Miguel Cardona, U.S. Department of Education (Kirschner, Adam) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael N. Turi on behalf of Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams (Turi, Michael) |
Filing 19 Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. Correction: Docket Entry #15 Summons/Affidavit of Service Corrected Because: The Summons/Affidavit of Servivce Were Filed Under the Wrong Event in CM/ECF NextGen By Counsel Ellis. The Summons/Affidavit of Service Were Re-Docketed Under the Correct CM/ECF Events. The Incorrect Answer Deadlines Removed and Corrected by the Docket Clerk. Please see ECF Nos. #16 , #17 , and #18 for the Corrected Enteries. |
Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to the United States Department of Education by Sara Dunn, Brittany Williams, Cherie Hart. (Attachments: #1 Service - US Department of Education)(Paine, Matthew) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to the United States Attorney General by Sara Dunn, Brittany Williams, Cherie Hart. (Attachments: #1 Service - US Attorney General)(Paine, Matthew) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney by Sara Dunn, Brittany Williams, Cherie Hart. Miguel Cardona served on 4/28/2022, answer due 6/27/2022; U.S. Department of Education served on 4/28/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Service - US Attorney - District of Massachusetts)(Paine, Matthew) |
Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Sara Dunn, Brittany Williams, Cherie Hart. Miguel Cardona served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022; U.S. Department of Education served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. Acknowledgement filed by Sara Dunn; Brittany Williams; Cherie Hart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - USPS Receipts)(Ellis, Rebecca) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Annapurna Balakrishna on behalf of Miguel Cardona, U.S. Department of Education (Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Zibel on behalf of Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams (Zibel, Daniel) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Elson on behalf of Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams (Elson, Alexander) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Olivia DeBlasio Webster on behalf of Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams (Webster, Olivia) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge William G. Young added. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 9 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. This case was filed and marked as "related" to Vara et al. v. Devos et al., 19cv12175 pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(g). This rule describes that civil cases will only be deemed related if (A) some or all of the parties are the same; and one of the following: (1) the cases involve the same or substantially similar issues of fact; (2) the cases arise out of the same occurrence, transaction or property; or (3) the cases involve insurance coverage for the same property, transaction or occurrence. L.R. 40.1(g)(1). Upon review of the Complaint (Doc. No. #1 ), this case does not appear to be related to Vara under L.R. 40.1(g)(1) because the cases involve separate schools and separate investigations. Even if there may be common legal questions, that alone is insufficient. Id. at (g)(3) (describing that civil cases are not related solely when they "involve a common question of the law" or "same or substantially similar challenges to a law, regulation, or government policy or practice"). Accordingly, the Clerk shall randomly reassign this case as it would any civil case not related to another civil case.(Belmont, Kellyann) |
Filing 8 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Alexander S. Elson, granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Olivia D. Webster, and granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Daniel A. Zibel. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Dore, Samantha) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Stuart T. Rossman on behalf of Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams (Rossman, Stuart) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Daniel A. Zibel Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9292278 by Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Daniel A. Zibel)(Ellis, Rebecca) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Olivia D. Webster Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9292245 by Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Olivia D. Webster)(Ellis, Rebecca) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Alexander S. Elson Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9292212 by Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Alexander S. Elson)(Ellis, Rebecca) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Miguel Cardona, U.S. Department of Education. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Dore, Samantha) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9290667 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Sara Dunn, Cherie Hart, Brittany Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Exhibit A Kaplan Inc. Assurance of Discontinuance, #4 Exhibit B Letter from Durbin to DeVos, #5 Exhibit C Letter from Jones to Durbin)(Ellis, Rebecca) Modified on 4/26/2022: Updated document description. (Dore, Samantha). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.