Haley et al v. NewRez LLC et al
| Josiah Haley and Carissa Haley |
| NewRez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Equifax Information Services, LLC, TransUnion, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv10716 |
| May 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #21 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint until August 8, 2022. The court warns that it is not inclined to any further extension. (Zierk, Marsha) |
| Filing 21 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(LaPointe, Jenna) |
| Filing 20 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc... (LaPointe, Jenna) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Jenna L. LaPointe on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (LaPointe, Jenna) |
| Filing 18 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #17 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to August 5, 2022 to File Answer to #1 Complaint. Equifax's answer is due August 5, 2022. There will be no further extensions. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 17 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to August 5, 2022 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Charpentier, Julianna) |
| Filing 16 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. TransUnion's answer or responsive pleading due by June 23, 2022. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to June 23, 2022 to File Answer Filed At The Request Of Defendant Trans Union by Carissa Haley, Josiah Haley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 14 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #13 MOTION for Extension of Time to July 7, 2022 to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Experian's responsive pleading due July 7, 2022. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to July 7, 2022 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Filed At The Request Of Defendant Experian by Carissa Haley, Josiah Haley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 12 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 6, 2022 to File Answer re #1 Complaint. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Danielle Andrews Long on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC (Long, Danielle) |
| Filing 10 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 6, 2022 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Charpentier, Julianna) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed TransUnion, LLC served on 5/18/2022, answer due 6/8/2022. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 5/17/2022, answer due 6/7/2022. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed NewRez LLC served on 5/16/2022, answer due 6/6/2022. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 5/16/2022, answer due 6/6/2022. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 5 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Yitzchak Zelman. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Yitzchak Zelman Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9320542 by Carissa Haley, Josiah Haley. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Service)(Crick, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC, NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, TransUnion, LLC Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9315297 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Carissa Haley, Josiah Haley. (Attachments: #1 Category Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crick, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
