Burr et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| William Burr and Eric Lehtinen |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A. |
| 1:2022cv10726 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Allison D Burroughs |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 10 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on May 18, 2022. [ECF No. #6 ]. By June 3, 2022, Plaintiffs still had not opposed the motion, and the Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, by June 10, 2022, as to why the complaint should not be dismissed for the reasons articulated in Defendants' motion. [ECF No. 9 ]. As of July 8, 2022, Plaintiffs have not responded to the Court's order or opposed the motion. Accordingly, Defendants' motion, [ECF No. #6 ], is GRANTED as unopposed and the complaint is dismissed. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 9 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. On May 18, 2022, Defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. [ECF No. #6 ]. Plaintiffs' response to this motion was due June 1, 2022. The Court recognizes that this case may be moot if the foreclosure sale that Plaintiffs sought to enjoin has already taken place, in which case Plaintiffs should so notify the court. Alternatively, Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause, in writing by June 10, 2022, why their complaint should not be dismissed for the reasons articulated in Defendants' motion. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 8 STATE COURT Record Bank of America, N.A. summons served on 4/20/2022, answer due 5/11/2022; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. summons served on 4/20/2022, answer due 5/11/2022.. (Dunne, Anne) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Dunne, Anne) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..(Dunne, Anne) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent JP Morgan Chase & Co. for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A... (Dunne, Anne) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bank of America, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent BAC North America Holding Company, Corporate Parent Bank of America Corporation, Corporate Parent NB Holdings Corporation for Bank of America, N.A... (Dunne, Anne) |
| Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9316469 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Dunne, Anne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
