Toby v. Gennette
Plaintiff: Rayan Toby
Defendant: Jeffrey Gennette
Case Number: 1:2022cv10829
Filed: June 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Donald L Cabell
Referring Judge: Indira Talwani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2022 Filing 10 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by July 29, 2022. (Kelly, Danielle)
June 21, 2022 Filing 9 STATE COURT Record. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(O'Connor, Sean)
June 8, 2022 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Sean P. O'Connor in Support re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jeffrey Gennette. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(O'Connor, Sean)
June 8, 2022 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jeffrey Gennette. (O'Connor, Sean)
June 8, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Jeffrey Gennette.(O'Connor, Sean)
June 7, 2022 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case RE-Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary)
June 7, 2022 Filing 4 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (O'Connor, Sean)
June 2, 2022 Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail (Phillips, Sophie)
June 1, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary)
June 1, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Jeffrey Gennette ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9346097 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Category Form (O'Connor, Sean) Modified on 6/1/2022 to update document descriptions (Phillips, Sophie).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toby v. Gennette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rayan Toby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Gennette
Represented By: Sean P. O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?