Cowart v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Caroline Cowart |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv10964 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Angel Kelley |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 3 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Caroline Cowart.(Valentine, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Caroline Cowart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Local Category Sheet)(Valentine, Elizabeth) Modified on 6/21/2022: Corrected docket text (Kelly, Danielle). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
