Liban v. Spera et al
| Malyun Ahmed Liban |
| Vincent Spera, Heather Merrit and Anthony Blinken |
| 1:2022cv11276 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Denise J Casper |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. Correction: Summons Returned Executed corrected because: documents were entered under the wrong event and all summons returned were attached. Summons returned as to the US Attorney was refiled to correct deadlines and remainder summons returned were entered correctly. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to the Attorney General - served on 8/22/2022. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed Vincent Spera served on 8/31/2022, answer due 9/21/2022. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed Heather Merrit served on 8/22/2022, answer due 9/12/2022. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed Anthony Blinken served on 8/22/2022, answer due 9/12/2022. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney by Malyun Ahmed Liban. US Attorney Rachel Rollins served on 8/18/2022, answer due 10/17/2022. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney by Malyun Ahmed Liban. Anthony Blinken served on 8/22/2022, answer due 10/21/2022; Heather Merrit served on 8/22/2022, answer due 10/21/2022; Vincent Spera served on 8/31/2022, answer due 10/31/2022., SUMMONS Returned Executed by Malyun Ahmed Liban. (Goldstein, Joshua) Modified on 9/7/2022: summons returned filed incorrectly using he wrong event. All summons returned refiled in correct entry - please see D. 8-12. (Currie, Haley). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Sauter on behalf of Anthony Blinken, Heather Merrit, Vincent Spera (Sauter, Mark) |
| Filing 5 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Currie, Haley) |
Filing 4
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Dore, Samantha)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Anthony Blinken, Heather Merrit, Vincent Spera. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9445765 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by MALYUN AHMED LIBAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Goldstein, Joshua) Modified on 8/8/2022: Updated document description. (Dore, Samantha). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
