American Graphics Institute, LLC v. Noble Desktop NYC, LLC
| American Graphics Institute, LLC |
| Noble Desktop NYC, LLC |
| 1:2022cv11404 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Allison D Burroughs |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #16 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages and Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 12/5/22 and 12/19/22 to File Response/Reply . (Folan, Karen) |
| Filing 16 Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages , Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 12/5/22 and 12/19/22 to File Response/Reply ( Responses due by 11/8/2022) by Noble Desktop NYC, LLC.(Ray, John) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Giovanna Helen Fessenden on behalf of American Graphics Institute, LLC (Fessenden, Giovanna) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by John L. DuPre' on behalf of American Graphics Institute, LLC (DuPre', John) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Noble Desktop NYC, LLC, filed by American Graphics Institute, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D- Part 1, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D- Part 2, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D- Part 3, #7 Exhibit Exhibit D- Part 4, #8 Exhibit Exhibit D- Part 5, #9 Exhibit Exhibit D- Part 6, #10 Exhibit Exhibit D- Part 7, #11 Exhibit Exhibit D- Part 8, #12 Exhibit Exhibit D- Part 9, #13 Exhibit Exhibit E, #14 Exhibit Exhibit F, #15 Exhibit Exhibit G, #16 Exhibit Exhibit H, #17 Exhibit Exhibit I, #18 Exhibit Exhibit J)(Sussman, Samuel) |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case RE-Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 11 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Sussman, Samuel) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Notification forms indicating whether or not a party has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge have not been received in the Clerk's Office. The submission of the form is mandatory. Completed forms shall be filed promptly. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Ferguson, Kerry) |
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion to Amend. On September 19, 2022, plaintiff American Graphics Institute, LLC filed #8 a motion to amend #1 its original complaint, together with [8-1] a proposed amended complaint. A party may amend a pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving it. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A). No proof of service has been docketed; however, counsel represents that plaintiff's original complaint was served on defendant Noble Desktop NYC, LLC on September 7, 2022. #8 . In any event, the summons issued just 18 days before plaintiff filed its motion to amend. #4 . Defendant has not yet responded to plaintiff's original complaint and has not opposed plaintiff's motion to amend. The court allows #8 , as filed within the time provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A) to amend a pleading once as a matter of course. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to re-file [8-1] on the docket as the amended complaint. (Ferguson, Kerry) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint,,, by American Graphics Institute, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Sussman, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #6 Assented to Motion for Extension of Time. The time for defendant to respond to plaintiff's complaint is extended to November 4, 2022. The time for plaintiff to respond to defendant's offer of judgment is extended to October 24, 2022. (Ferguson, Kerry) |
| Filing 6 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to November 4, 2022 to Respond to Complaint and to October 24, 2022 for Plaintiff to Respond to Rule 68 Offer of Judgment by Noble Desktop NYC, LLC.(Ray, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Ray, III on behalf of Noble Desktop NYC, LLC (Ray, John) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Noble Desktop NYC, LLC. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the filing of copyright case. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Noble Desktop NYC, LLC Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9476896 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by American Graphics Institute, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, # REFER TO ENTRY #2 AO 121, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit Exhibit D-Part 1, #8 Exhibit Exhibit D-Part 2, #9 Exhibit Exhibit D-Part 3, #10 Exhibit Exhibit D-Part 4, #11 Exhibit Exhibit D-Part 5, #12 Exhibit Exhibit D-Part 6, #13 Exhibit Exhibit D-Part 7, #14 Exhibit Exhibit D-Part 8, #15 Exhibit Exhibit D-Part 9, #16 Exhibit Exhibit E, #17 Exhibit Exhibit F, #18 Exhibit Exhibit G, #19 Exhibit Exhibit H, #20 Exhibit Exhibit I, #21 Exhibit Exhibit J)(Sussman, Samuel) Modified on 9/1/2022 (Kelly, Danielle). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: American Graphics Institute, LLC v. Noble Desktop NYC, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: American Graphics Institute, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Samuel J. Sussman |
| Represented By: | Giovanna Helen Fessenden |
| Represented By: | John L. DuPre' |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Noble Desktop NYC, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John H. Ray, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
