Alianza Americas et al v. DeSantis et al
| Alianza Americas, Yanet Doe, Pablo Doe and Jesus Doe |
| Ronald DeSantis, Jared W. Perdue, Florida, State of, Florida Department of Transportation and Does 1-5 |
| Emanuel McCray and Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith |
| 1:2022cv11550 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Allison D Burroughs |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Letter/request for leave to file from Non- Party Derrick lee Cardello-Smith. (Attachments: #1 Motion to File an Amicus Brief, #2 Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to Filee)(McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 18 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Court is in receipt of [ECF Nos. #16 , #17 ] filed by a non-party to the case. To the extent [ECF Nos. 16-2 and 17-2] seek to amend the case caption, they are DENIED, and to the extent the movant asks to file an amicus brief, that request is also DENIED.(McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 17 Letter/request to file documents by non-party Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appearance, #2 Motion to Amend) (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 16 Letter/request to file documents by non-party Derrick Lee Cordello-Smith (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appearance, #2 Motion to Amend)(McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 15 Opposition re #11 MOTION to Intervene filed by Alianza Americas, Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe. (Leonetti, Kenneth) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth S. Leonetti on behalf of Alianza Americas, Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe (Leonetti, Kenneth) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew E. Miller on behalf of Alianza Americas, Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe (Miller, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Madeleine K. Rodriguez on behalf of Alianza Americas, Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe (Rodriguez, Madeleine) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Intervene by Emanuel McCray. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Oren M. Sellstrom on behalf of Alianza Americas, Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe (Sellstrom, Oren) |
| Filing 9 Letter/request (non-motion) from Non- Party Derrick lee Cardello-Smith. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mirian Albert on behalf of Alianza Americas, Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe (Albert, Mirian) |
| Filing 7 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Plaintiffs motion to proceed pseudonymously, [ECF No. #5 ], is GRANTED. There is a strong presumption against the use of pseudonyms in civil litigation. Doe v. Mass. Inst. of Tech., No. 22-cv-1056, 2022 WL 3646028, at *4 (1st Cir. 2022) (citation omitted). Courts, however, have discretion to allow a party to proceed pseudonymously in circumstances where that party has a substantial privacy right which outweighs the customary and constitutionally-embedded presumption of openness in judicial proceedings. Doe v. W. New England Univ., No. 19-cv-30124, 2019 WL 10890195, at *1 (D. Mass. Dec. 16, 2019) (citation omitted). In adjudicating a motion to proceed under pseudonym, the First Circuit has recently instructed that the inquiry should focus upon the extent to which the facts align with one or more of the following paradigms: whether the case is one in which the movant reasonably fears that coming out of the shadows will cause him unusually severe physical or mental harm; whether the case is one in which compelled disclosure of the movant's name will likely lead to disclosure of a nonparty's identity, causing the latter substantial harm; whether the case is one in which compelled disclosure would likely deter, to an unacceptable degree, similarly situated individuals from litigating; or whether the federal suit is bound up with a prior proceeding subject by law to confidentiality protections and forcing disclosure of the partys identity would significantly impinge upon the interests served by keeping the prior proceeding confidential. Mass. Inst. of Tech., 2022 WL 3646028, at *8.Having considered Plaintiffs motion, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have rebutted the presumption in favor of disclosure. Once counsel for Defendants have entered appearances, they may elect to file a motion for reconsideration. (McManus, Caetlin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivan E. Espinoza-Madrigal on behalf of Alianza Americas, Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe (Espinoza-Madrigal, Ivan) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed Pseudonymously by Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe. (Attachments: #1 Attorney Declaration)(Love, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob M. Love on behalf of Alianza Americas, Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe (Love, Jacob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9506839 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Alianza Americas, Jesus Doe, Pablo Doe, Yanet Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Category Form)(Love, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
