Winegar v. Boncher
Petitioner: Ryder Winegar
Respondent: Amy Boncher
Case Number: 1:2022cv11632
Filed: October 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: F Dennis Saylor
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2022 Filing 16 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.For the foregoing reasons, respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that petitioner alleges that his confinement is unlawful due to the failure of BOP to prospectively apply FSA credits to his sentence for programming he has not yet completed. The Court reserves judgment on the issue of whether BOP failed to apply earned credits to petitioner's sentence for programming he completed between January 2022 and the present, and whether BOP has failed to properly consider petitioner for placement in a residential re-entry center or home confinement at the appropriate date based upon his earned time. Petitioner Ryder Winegar shall file a supplemental memorandum as soon as practicable addressing this issue, given his own projection of his release date. Respondent shall file a supplemental memorandum no later than 7 days after the filing of petitioner's supplemental memorandum. So Ordered. (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
November 29, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Liability of Deprivation of Liberty Without Due Process of Law in Violation of the Fifth Amendment by Ryder Winegar (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Dore, Samantha)
November 29, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION for Expedited Emergency Hearing on for before December 19, 2022 by Ryder Winegar. (Dore, Samantha)
November 4, 2022 Filing 13 Petitioner's REPLY to Government's Response to Petition For a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ryder Winegar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6). (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
October 27, 2022 Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Amy Boncher. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Bourke Declaration)(Fitzgerald, Michael)
October 27, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Amy Boncher.(Fitzgerald, Michael)
October 27, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Fitzgerald on behalf of Amy Boncher (Fitzgerald, Michael)
October 13, 2022 Filing 9 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filing fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis)
October 13, 2022 Filing 8 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filing fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days.(Castilla, Francis)
October 13, 2022 Filing 7 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. Order entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2243 governing Section 2241 cases for service on respondents. (PSSA, 5)
October 12, 2022 Filing 6 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 100000611 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (Barbosa, Nilsa)
October 4, 2022 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Finn, Mary)
October 4, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV added. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson no longer assigned to case. (Case assigned to MJ Robertson in error) (Finn, Mary)
October 4, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary)
October 3, 2022 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Ryder Winegar. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Castilla, Francis)
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Ryder Winegar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winegar v. Boncher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ryder Winegar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Amy Boncher
Represented By: Michael Fitzgerald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?