Concepcion v. Alves et al
| Raymond Concepcion |
| Superintendent Nelson Alves and Attorney General Maura Healey |
| 1:2022cv11703 |
| October 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Indira Talwani |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 1000001234 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Phillips, Sophie) |
| Filing 8 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. "In supplement to the court's Order at [Doc. 7], it is FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitioner Raymond Concepcion shall by November 21, 2022, file a complete, signed AO 240 and provide a prison account statement as of October 6, 2022, the date the petition was filed, to determine whether he has sufficient funds to pay the modest $5.00 filing fee. See Rule 3(a)(2) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (requiring a motion to proceed in forma pauperis be accompanied by 'a certificate from the warden or other appropriate officer of the place of confinement showing the amount of money or securities that the petitioner has in any account in the institution'). Alternatively, the petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee by that date. Failure to comply with this order may result in revocation of Concepcions conditionally allowed in forma pauperis status and dismissal of the petition without prejudice." (PSSA, 5) |
| Filing 7 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER denying without prejudice Petitioner's renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #6 . Petitioner's original motion #4 was approved conditionally, as it showed Petitioner to be without funds, but was not signed by Petitioner. See Elec. Order 5 . Petitioner's renewed motion is signed, but is blank, and therefore cannot be approved. Petitioner may resubmit an application containing both the factual information set forth in the original application and his written signature attesting to these facts. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond Concepcion. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit signed version)(Billowitz, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Petitioners Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [Doc. 4] is hereby is CONDITIONALLY ALLOWED. The Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees [Doc. 4-1] attached to the motion is not signed with the petitioners written signature. Petitioner shall within 30 days file a hand signed Application. (PSSA, 5) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond Concepcion. (Attachments: #1 AO240)(Billowitz, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Raymond Concepcion. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit affidavit of counsel)(Billowitz, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 Fee Status: IFP requested., filed by Raymond Concepcion W107756. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS044, #2 category form)(Billowitz, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
