Ahold U.S.A., Inc. v. Echo Global Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ahold U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant: Echo Global Logistics, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv11769
Filed: October 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M Gorton
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2022 Filing 13 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Smith, David)
December 8, 2022 Filing 12 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference set for 12/16/2022 11:15 AM in Remote Proceeding : Boston before Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton. (Lima, Christine)
December 6, 2022 Filing 11 Assented to MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Ahold U.S.A., Inc..(Han, Young)
December 6, 2022 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF RESCHEDULING Scheduling Conference set for 12/13/2022 11:00 AM in Remote Proceeding : Boston before Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton. Defendant is reminded to submit it's Certification pursuant to Local Rule. 16.1.(Lima, Christine)
November 28, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Han, Young)
November 7, 2022 Filing 8 JOINT STATEMENT of counsel PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.1(d). (Han, Young)
October 27, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference Scheduling Conference, to be held by telephone, set for 12/7/2022 03:00 PM in Remote Proceeding : Boston before Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton. (Lima, Christine)
October 27, 2022 Filing 6 STATE COURT Record All Parties.. (Smith, David)
October 21, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Echo Global Logistics, Inc..(Smith, David)
October 17, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Young B. Han on behalf of Ahold U.S.A., Inc. (Han, Young)
October 17, 2022 Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Currie, Haley)
October 17, 2022 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary)
October 17, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Echo Global Logistics, Inc. Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9544267 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Echo Global Logistics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Category Form)(Smith, David) Modified on 10/17/2022 to adjust docket text (Currie, Haley).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ahold U.S.A., Inc. v. Echo Global Logistics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ahold U.S.A., Inc.
Represented By: Adam G Cohen
Represented By: Young B. Han
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Echo Global Logistics, Inc.
Represented By: David S. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?