Diallo v. JADDOU
| Kadiatou Diallo |
| Director UR M. JADDOU |
| 1:2022cv11786 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Kadiatou Diallo (Karuga-Ndivo, Catherine) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Sauter on behalf of UR M. JADDOU (Sauter, Mark) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to UR M. JADDOU. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF (instructions for service by USMS), copy of L.R. 4.1 and copy of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 4 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis The Clerk shall issue a summons. The plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint and summons in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 4.1 within 90 days of the date the summons is issued. The plaintiff may elect to have service made by the United States Marshal Service. If so asked by the plaintiff, the United States Marshals Service shall complete service as directed by the plaintiff with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. The plaintiff is responsible for providing the United States Marshals Service all papers for service. The USM-285 form may be found at www.usmarshals.gov/process/usm285.pdf and is also available from the Clerk upon request.(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kadiatou Diallo. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UR M. JADDOU (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Kadiatou Diallo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Category Sheet)(Karuga-Ndivo, Catherine) Modified on 10/20/2022 to docket motion for IFP as a separate entry. (Pacho, Arnold). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diallo v. JADDOU | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kadiatou Diallo | |
| Represented By: | Catherine N Karuga-Ndivo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Director UR M. JADDOU | |
| Represented By: | Mark Sauter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
