Tehranian v. Lyft, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Mathew Tehranian
Defendant: Lyft, Inc. and Bauliere Accime
Case Number: 1:2022cv11838
Filed: October 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: F Dennis Saylor
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2022 Filing 10 Case file sent to Norfolk Superior Court. (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
November 15, 2022 Filing 9 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. ORDER OF REMAND to the State Court. (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
November 15, 2022 Filing 8 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING #6 Motion to Remand to Norfolk Superior Court. (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
November 14, 2022 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 Assented to MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Mathew Tehranian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(de Oliveira, Flaviana)
November 11, 2022 Filing 6 Assented to MOTION to Remand to State Court by Mathew Tehranian. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Memo of Law in Support )(Segal, Samuel) Memorandum of law in support of motion, deleted and properly docketed as its own entry. See entry #7 Modified on 11/14/2022 (de Oliveira, Flaviana).
November 2, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Bauliere Accime. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
November 2, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT First against Lyft, Inc., filed by Mathew Tehranian.(Segal, Samuel)
October 28, 2022 Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Currie, Haley)
October 28, 2022 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary)
October 28, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9563332 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Action Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Docket Entries, #3 Exhibit Category Sheet)(O'Leary, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tehranian v. Lyft, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mathew Tehranian
Represented By: Samuel A. Segal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lyft, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Mackay O'Leary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bauliere Accime
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?