Morgan v. Zyno Solutions, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Sharon Morgan
Defendant: Zyno Solutions, LLC doing business as Care Everywhere, LLC and Chao Young Lee
Case Number: 1:2022cv12071
Filed: December 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Paul G Levenson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2022 Filing 9 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Nadich, Aaron)
December 16, 2022 Filing 8 STATE COURT Record. (Nadich, Aaron)
December 14, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Flam on behalf of Sharon Morgan (Flam, Benjamin)
December 13, 2022 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Zyno Solutions, LLC. (Nadich, Aaron)
December 13, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Chao Young Lee, Zyno Solutions, LLC.(Nadich, Aaron)
December 7, 2022 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson: ORDER entered RE: ORDER REQUIRING DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS(Dumoulin, Rose)
December 6, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Zyno Solutions, LLC. (Nadich, Aaron)
December 6, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary)
December 6, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Chao Young Lee, Zyno Solutions, LLC ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9617379 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 State court complaint, #2 Zyno Solutions summons, #3 C. Lee summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Category Form 4)(Nadich, Aaron)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan v. Zyno Solutions, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon Morgan
Represented By: Philip J. Gordon
Represented By: Benjamin Flam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zyno Solutions, LLC doing business as Care Everywhere, LLC
Represented By: Aaron F. Nadich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chao Young Lee
Represented By: Aaron F. Nadich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?