Hernandez v. Boncher
| Rhinelander Hernandez |
| Amy Boncher |
| 1:2022cv12156 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 9 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting #7 Motion to Dismiss. "The petition is dismissed as moot." (Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Amy Boncher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Amy Boncher.(Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Annapurna Balakrishna on behalf of Amy Boncher (Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
| Filing 5 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. The Respondent shall file an answer or other responsive pleading within seven (7) days of the date of this Order.(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case RE-Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 100001520 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (Barbosa, Nilsa) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Rhinelander Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hernandez v. Boncher | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rhinelander Hernandez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Amy Boncher | |
| Represented By: | Annapurna Balakrishna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
