Tranquillo v. Vitale
| Nicholas Tranquillo |
| Josephine A. Vitale |
| 1:2022cv12178 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Josephine A. Vitale served on 1/11/2023, answer due 2/1/2023. (Stetson, Robert) |
| Filing 7 Copy of 6 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, mailed and emailed to Josephine A. Vitale on 2/2/2023. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 6 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Defendant Josephine Vitale can locate and engage counsel without need to be physically in Boston. If she decides to proceed pro se, the court can provide her with the ability to file electronically and attend most court proceedings via video (Zoom). The court will extend the time in which she must respond to the Complaint until April 3, 2023, which is ample time to telephonically engage counsel and/or respond to the Complaint. The court is not inclined to any further extension in this matter. (Zierk, Marsha) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Retain Counsel and Retrieve Documents by Josephine A. Vitale. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Nicholas Tranquillo. (Stetson, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Josephine A. Vitale. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOSEPHINE A. VITALE, Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9640676 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Nicholas Tranquillo, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Nicholas A. Tranquillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Stetson, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tranquillo v. Vitale | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicholas Tranquillo | |
| Represented By: | Robert W. Stetson, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Josephine A. Vitale | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
