Patel et al v. GARLAND et al
| Bharatkumar Patel, Patel Gitaben, Keyur Patel and Radhika Gohel |
| MERRICK GARLAND and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS |
| 1:2022cv12191 |
| December 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Denise J Casper |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Permissive Joinder to allow Plaintiffs to join same action by Keyur Patel. (Hourihan, Lisa) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keyur Patel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail signed US Attorney Washington DC)(Gregoire, Claudia) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney by Keyur Patel. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipt US Attorney, #2 Exhibit Tracking showing delivered US Attorney, #3 Exhibit Certified mail signed US Attorney)(Gregoire, Claudia) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas E. Kanwit on behalf of MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS (Kanwit, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 3
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
|
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Joinder Permissive to allow Plaintiffs to join same action by Keyur Patel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Supplement B signed by police showing on third page father Bharatkumar Patel and son Keyur Patel were victims during same incident, #2 Exhibit B Receipt I918A Gitaben Patel showing she is derivative beneficiary of her husband Bharatkumar Patel's case, #3 Exhibit C Receipt I918A Radhika Gohel showing she is derivative beneficiary of U Visa case of husband Keyur Patel)(Gregoire, Claudia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9643241 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Keyur Patel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Category Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A USCIS Policy Manual Bona Fide Determination U Visa, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B I918 U Visa Receipt Keyur Patel, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C I765 work permit Keyur Patel C14, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D I918A and I765 receipts wife Keyur Patel Radhika Gohel U Visa Receipt Derivative Spouse, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E Bharatkumar Patel Keyur Patel Father U Visa Receipt, #8 Exhibit Exhibit F Bharatkumar Patel I765 work permit receipt c14 category, #9 Exhibit Exhibit G Gitaben Patel I918A Derivative Spouse U Visa receipt, #10 Exhibit Exhibit H Gitaben Patel Bharatkumar Patel wife Work permit receipt c14 category)(Gregoire, Claudia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
