Jenkins v. Princeton Mortgage Corporation et al
| Kevin Jenkins |
| Princeton Mortgage Corporation, Richard A Weidel and Mark Gordon |
| 1:2022cv12213 |
| December 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| George A OToole |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 by Mark Gordon, Princeton Mortgage Corporation, Richard A Weidel.(Wakefield, Reid) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Koltun, Joseph) |
| Filing 16 JOINT SUBMISSION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 by Mark Gordon, Princeton Mortgage Corporation, Richard A Weidel.(Wakefield, Reid) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address or Firm Name by Joseph J. Koltun (Koltun, Joseph) |
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing. Scheduling Conference set for 2/28/2023 03:00 PM in Courtroom 22 (In person only) before Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr.. Please see attached standing order. (Fleming, John) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Counterclaim by Kevin Jenkins.(Koltun, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed Mark Gordon served on 1/13/2023, answer due 2/3/2023. (Koltun, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Mark Gordon. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 10 Letter/request (non-motion) from Anne L. Josephson, Esq. requesting Summons . (Josephson, Anne) |
| Filing 9 STATE COURT Record Princeton Mortgage Corporation summons served on 12/8/2022, answer due 12/29/2022; Richard A Weidel summons served on 12/16/2022, answer due 1/6/2023.. (Wakefield, Reid) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph J. Koltun on behalf of Kevin Jenkins (Koltun, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM of Princeton Mortgage Corporation against Kevin Jenkins by Mark Gordon, Richard A Weidel, Princeton Mortgage Corporation.(Wakefield, Reid) |
| Filing 6 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Kilroy on behalf of Mark Gordon, Princeton Mortgage Corporation, Richard A Weidel (Kilroy, Robert) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge George A. OToole, Jr assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Princeton Mortgage Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Effortless Holdings, Inc. for Princeton Mortgage Corporation.. (Wakefield, Reid) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Reid Michael Wakefield on behalf of Mark Gordon, Princeton Mortgage Corporation, Richard A Weidel (Wakefield, Reid) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mark Gordon, Princeton Mortgage Corporation, Richard A Weidel ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9646542 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Served Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Form Category Form)(Wakefield, Reid) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
