Jones v. Massachusetts Port Authority
| Cecila Jones |
| Massachusetts Port Authority |
| 1:2022cv12239 |
| December 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Angel Kelley |
| Paul G Levenson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson added. District Judge Angel Kelley no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT by all parties to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC NOTICE Canceling Hearing. The parties have indicated in their #5 proposed scheduling order that they consent to trial by magistrate judge. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference previously set for 2/27/23 is CANCELLED. (Lara, Miguel)
|
| Filing 5 Recommendations for Scheduling Order . (Fay, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference:The parties are directed to consult and submit an agreed-upon pretrial schedule, as per the attached sample, no later than 7 days before the Scheduling Conference. If the Court finds parties' proposed deadlines reasonable or requires only minor adjustments, it may enter a scheduling order in lieu of holding the scheduling conference. Otherwise, Scheduling Conference set for 2/27/2023 02:30 PM in Courtroom 8 (In person only) before District Judge Angel Kelley.Should the parties wish to appear by video conference, and all parties assent to such change, they may reach out to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk to modify the hearing no later than two business days prior to the scheduled hearing. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Dore, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Massachusetts Port Authority ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9648840 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Fay, Thomas) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/30/2022: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet and Category Form) (Dore, Samantha). (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/30/2022) (Dore, Samantha). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Massachusetts Port Authority | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cecila Jones | |
| Represented By: | Anna Shapiro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Massachusetts Port Authority | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. Fay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
