AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH v. Pharmaessentia USA Corporation
Petitioner: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH
Respondent: Pharmaessentia USA Corporation
Case Number: 1:2022mc91022
Filed: January 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Mark L Wolf
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2022 Filing 27 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Mark L. Wolf: Hearing re #1 APPLICATION by Petitioner AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH for an Order to take Discovery in Aid of a Foreign Criminal Investigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 held on 3/15/2022; argument given; parties ordered to request copies of the transcript to today's hearing; Court denied AOP's application without prejudice (for reasons stated on the record), subject to renewal if such circumstances arise for doing so. (Court Reporter: Kristin Kelley at kmob929@gmail.com)(Attorneys present: Allison, Horne, Blatchley, Floyd, and Johnson, III, Zaslowksy) (Lovett, Jarrett)
March 10, 2022 Filing 26 Response by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH to #1 Complaint,, (Supplemental Memorandum of Law in further Support of Application to take Discovery). (Blatchley, Samuel)
February 21, 2022 Filing 25 DECLARATION re #23 Response, (Reply Declaration of Edward W. Floyd) by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Blatchley, Samuel)
February 21, 2022 Filing 24 DECLARATION re #23 Response, (Reply Declaration of Dr. Christian Rosinus) by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Blatchley, Samuel)
February 21, 2022 Filing 23 Response by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH to #1 Complaint,, #19 Response, (Petitioner's Reply Memorandum of Law in further Support of its Application for an Order to Take Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782). (Blatchley, Samuel)
February 17, 2022 Filing 22 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #18 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added David Zaslowsky. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (McDonagh, Christina)
February 17, 2022 Filing 21 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Matthew G. Allison. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McDonagh, Christina)
February 16, 2022 Filing 20 DECLARATION re #19 Response, DORR DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO 28 USC 1782 by Pharmaessentia USA Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Dorr Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Dorr Declaration, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Dorr Declaration)(Blazejewski, Christopher)
February 16, 2022 Filing 19 Response by Pharmaessentia USA Corporation to #1 Complaint,, #4 Memorandum of Law IN OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO 28 USC 1782. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Appendix 1 to Opposition)(Blazejewski, Christopher)
February 16, 2022 Filing 18 Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of David Zaslowsky Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9188364 by Pharmaessentia USA Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Zaslowsky Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Blazejewski, Christopher) (Main Document 18 replaced on 2/17/2022) (McDonagh, Christina).
February 16, 2022 Filing 17 Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Matthew G. Allison Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9188345 by Pharmaessentia USA Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A Allison Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Blazejewski, Christopher)
February 16, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher R. Blazejewski on behalf of Pharmaessentia USA Corporation (Blazejewski, Christopher)
February 12, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address or Firm Name by Samuel P. Blatchley (Blatchley, Samuel)
January 26, 2022 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed Pharmaessentia USA Corporation served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. (Blatchley, Samuel)
January 26, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward W. Floyd on behalf of AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH (Floyd, Edward)
January 26, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Thomas Johnson, III on behalf of AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH (Johnson, Joseph)
January 26, 2022 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Pharmaessentia USA Corporation. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (McDonagh, Christina)
January 24, 2022 Filing 10 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Joseph Johnson. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (McDonagh, Christina)
January 24, 2022 Filing 9 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Edward W. Floyd. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McDonagh, Christina)
January 24, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Joseph Johnson, Esq. Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9150357 by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Samuel P. Blatchley, #2 Declaration of Joseph Johnson)(Blatchley, Samuel)
January 24, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Edward W. Floyd, Esq. Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9150348 by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Samuel P. Blatchley, #2 Declaration of Edward W. Floyd)(Blatchley, Samuel)
January 18, 2022 Filing 6 DECLARATION of Dr. Christian Rosinus in Support of #1 APPLICATION by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH. (Currie, Haley)
January 18, 2022 Filing 5 DECLARATION of Edward W. Floyd in Support of #1 APPLICATION by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH. (Currie, Haley)
January 18, 2022 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Support to #1 APPLICATION by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Currie, Haley)
January 18, 2022 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark L. Wolf assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Danieli, Chris)
January 17, 2022 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by AOP ORPHAN PHARMACEUTICALS GMBH. (Blatchley, Samuel)
January 17, 2022 Filing 1 APPLICATION by Petitioner AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH for an Order to take Discovery in Aid of a Foreign Criminal Investigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782)against Pharmaessentia USA Corporation Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9140253 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH. (Attachments: (6) Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Local Category Form)(Blatchley, Samuel) Modified on 1/18/2022 : adjusted docket text. Removed Memo in Support, Ex. A and B, and both Declarations into own entries. Please see #4 , #5 and #6 for correct filings. (Currie, Haley).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH v. Pharmaessentia USA Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals GMBH
Represented By: Samuel P. Blatchley
Represented By: Edward W. Floyd
Represented By: Joseph Thomas Johnson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pharmaessentia USA Corporation
Represented By: Matthew G. Allison
Represented By: Christopher R. Blazejewski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?