Spaulding et al v. Town of Natick et al
| Corey Spaulding and Sarah Catherine Spaulding |
| Town of Natick, Department of Education, US Department of Education, US Department of Justice, Catherine Collins, Ketherine Craven, US Secretary Miguel Cardona and Merrick Garland |
| 1:2023cv10017 |
| January 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Corey Spaulding.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ( Responses due by 1/18/2023) by Corey Spaulding.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Corey Spaulding. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Corey Spaulding, Sarah Catherine Spaulding. Civil Cover Sheet Category)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
