Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Lopez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administation
Case Number: 1:2023cv10040
Filed: January 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Donald L Cabell
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell: ORDER entered. Procedural Order re Social Security Action (Russo, Noreen)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT by all parties to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Elizabeth Lopez.. (Jacobs, Tricia)
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Notification forms indicating whether or not a party has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge have not been received in the Clerk's Office. The submission of the form is mandatory. Completed forms should be filed promptly. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Russo, Noreen)
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy C. Bland on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Bland, Amy)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Castilla, Francis)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE (service by USMS), Local Rule 4.1 and FORM FOR CONSENT OR REFUSAL TO CONSENT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR THAT FORM. (Attachments: #1 consent package)(PSSA, 4)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue summons for service of the defendant. The plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint, summons, and Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge on the defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 4.1 within 90 days of the date the summons is issued. The parties must indicate their consent or refusal to consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge within 30 days of service on the defendant. If so asked by the plaintiff, the United States Marshals Service shall complete service as directed by the plaintiff with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. The plaintiff is responsible for providing the United States Marshals Service all papers for service. Please note, Form USM 285 can be obtained from the Clerk's office or at https://www.usmarshals.gov/process/usm285.pdf.(PSSA, 4)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elizabeth Lopez.(Jacobs, Tricia)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Elizabeth Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Local Catergory Form)(Jacobs, Tricia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Lopez
Represented By: Tricia M. Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Amy C. Bland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administation
Represented By: Christopher A. Michaels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?