Calloway v. Meeran
Rilwan Meeran |
Chantel Calloway |
1:2023cv10295 |
February 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Angel Kelley |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The parties' #13 joint statement is PARTIALLY ADOPTED. The Court sets the following deadlines: SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES:Initial disclosures: April 21, 2023 Amendments to Pleadings: May 22, 2023Close of Fact Discovery: December 21, 2023 Close of Expert Discovery: April 21, 2024The Court will address dispositive motion deadlines at the next status conference.NOTICE OF HEARING:The Scheduling Conference previously scheduled for 3/21/23 is CANCELLED. Status Conference set for 12/27/2023 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (In person only) before District Judge Angel Kelley.Should the parties wish to appear by video conference, and all parties assent to such change, they may reach out to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk to modify the hearing no later than two business days prior to the scheduled hearing.(Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Welsh, Richard) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Koltun, Joseph) |
Filing 13 JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference . (Koltun, Joseph) |
Filing 12 STATE COURT Record Rilwan Meeran summons served on 1/20/2023, answer due 2/27/2023.. (Koltun, Joseph) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Counterclaim by Chantel Calloway.(Welsh, Richard) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address or Firm Name by Joseph J. Koltun (Koltun, Joseph) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference:The parties are directed to consult and submit an agreed-upon pretrial schedule, as per the attached sample, no later than 7 days before the Scheduling Conference. If the Court finds parties' proposed deadlines reasonable or requires only minor adjustments, it may enter a scheduling order in lieu of holding the scheduling conference. Otherwise, Scheduling Conference set for 3/21/2023 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (In person only) before District Judge Angel Kelley. Should the parties wish to appear by video conference, and all parties assent to such change, they may reach out to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk to modify the hearing no later than two business days prior to the scheduled hearing.(Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against Chantel Calloway by Rilwan Meeran.(Koltun, Joseph) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. District Judge Angel Kelley added. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson no longer assigned to case. (case assigned to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson in error). (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Healy, Bethaney) |
Filing 3 Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. Correction: Docket entry 2 case transferred to the Western Division. corrected because: Case transferred in error and to remain in the Boston Division. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 Case transferred to Western Division (Springfield) (Warnock, Douglas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Rilwan Meeran ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9705108 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C Category Form)(Koltun, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Calloway v. Meeran | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Counter defendant: Chantel Calloway | |
Represented By: | Richard M. Welsh, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rilwan Meeran | |
Represented By: | Anne L. Josephson |
Represented By: | Joseph J. Koltun |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.