Securities & Exchange Commission v. HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC et al
| Securities & Exchange Commission |
| HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC, HITE Hedge LP, HITE Hedge II LP and HITE Hedge Offshore Ltd. |
| 1:2023cv10351 |
| February 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Securities & Exchange Commission against HITE Hedge Offshore Ltd.(Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 11 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Securities & Exchange Commission against HITE Hedge II LP(Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 10 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Securities & Exchange Commission against HITE Hedge LP(Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 9 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Securities & Exchange Commission against HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 8 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #4 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment -UNOBJECTED-TO- by Securities & Exchange Commission. ALLOWED. (Belmont, Kellyann) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Hayley Trahan-Liptak on behalf of HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC, HITE Hedge II LP, HITE Hedge LP, HITE Hedge Offshore Ltd. (Trahan-Liptak, Hayley) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Neil Thomas Smith on behalf of HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC, HITE Hedge II LP, HITE Hedge LP, HITE Hedge Offshore Ltd. (Smith, Neil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher F. Warner on behalf of HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC, HITE Hedge II LP, HITE Hedge LP, HITE Hedge Offshore Ltd. (Warner, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment -UNOBJECTED-TO- by Securities & Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent Defendant HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent Relief Defendant HITE Hedge LP, #3 Exhibit 3 - Consent Relief Defendant HITE Hedge II LP, #4 Exhibit 4 - Consent Relief Defendant HITE Hedge Offshore Ltd., #5 Exhibit 5 - Proposed Final Judgment - HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC, #6 Exhibit 6 - Proposed Final Judgment - HITE Hedge LP, #7 Exhibit 7 - Proposed Final Judgment - HITE Hedge II LP, #8 Exhibit 8 - Proposed Final Judgment - HITE Hedge Offshore Ltd.)(Harper, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC, HITE Hedge II LP, HITE Hedge LP, HITE Hedge Offshore Ltd.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee Status: US Government), filed by Securities & Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Harper, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
