IOT Innovations LLC v. SimpliSafe, Inc.
IOT Innovations LLC |
SimpliSafe, Inc. |
1:2023cv10352 |
February 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Richard G Stearns |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Support re #22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by SimpliSafe, Inc.. (Bell, Cory) |
Filing 22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by SimpliSafe, Inc..(Bell, Cory) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Lionel M. Lavenue on behalf of SimpliSafe, Inc. (Lavenue, Lionel) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Kara A. Specht on behalf of SimpliSafe, Inc. (Specht, Kara) |
Filing 19 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Lionel M. Lavenue, Kara A. Specht, and Clinton P. Greub. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 18 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's response to the Complaint is due 4/14/2023. (RGS, law3) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 14, 2023 to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, [UNOPPOSED] by SimpliSafe, Inc..(Bell, Cory) |
Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by SimpliSafe, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent SimpliSafe Holding Corporation for SimpliSafe, Inc... (Bell, Cory) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Lionel M. Lavenue; Kara A. Specht; Clinton P. Greub Filing fee: $ 375, receipt number AMADC-9746110 by SimpliSafe, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1 - Certification of Lionel M. Lavenue, #2 Ex. 2 - Certification of Kara A. Specht, #3 Ex. 3 - Certification of Clinton P. Greub)(Bell, Cory) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Cory C. Bell on behalf of SimpliSafe, Inc. (Bell, Cory) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed SimpliSafe, Inc. served on 2/22/2023, answer due 3/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rozier, Carey) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by James F. McDonough, III on behalf of IOT Innovations LLC (McDonough, James) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan L. Hardt on behalf of IOT Innovations LLC (Hardt, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Carey Matthew Rozier on behalf of IOT Innovations LLC (Rozier, Carey) |
Filing 9 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added James F. McDonough, III, Jonathan Lloyd Hardt, and Carey Matthey Rozier. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of James F. McDonough, III; Jonathan Lloyd Hardt; Carey Matthew Rozier Filing fee: $ 375, receipt number AMADC-9734495 by IOT Innovations LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Attorney James F. McDonough, III, #2 Affidavit Attorney Jonathan Lloyd Hardt, #3 Affidavit Attorney Carey Matthew Rozier)(Godkin, David) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to SimpliSafe, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David S. Godkin on behalf of IOT INNOVATIONS LLC (Godkin, David) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Kruzer, James) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by IOT INNOVATIONS LLC. (Kruzer, James) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James E. Kruzer on behalf of IOT INNOVATIONS LLC (Kruzer, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SIMPLISAFE, INC., Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9724581 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by IOT INNOVATIONS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A.U.S. Patent No. 7,209,876, #2 Exhibit B.U.S. Patent No. 7,263,102, #3 Exhibit C.U.S. Patent No. 7,526,762, #4 Exhibit D.U.S. Patent No. 7,983,282, #5 Exhibit E.U.S. Patent No. 8,972,576, #6 Exhibit F.U.S. Patent No. 9,008,055, #7 Exhibit G.Webpage: https://simplisafe.com/, #8 Exhibit H.Webpage: https://simplisafe.com/home-security-shop-packages, #9 Exhibit I.Webpage: https://support.simplisafe.com, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Category Form)(Kruzer, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.