Mendes v. WinnCompanies LLC et al
Genesa Mendes |
WinnCompanies LLC, Winn Property Management and John Kuppens |
1:2023cv10417 |
February 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
F Dennis Saylor |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #19 Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (McKillop, Matthew) |
Filing 19 Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss by John Kuppens, WinnCompanies LLC.(Lemire, Ellen) |
Filing 18 Opposition re #13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Genesa Mendes. (Ruggieri, Janet) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by Alice A. Kokodis (Kokodis, Alice) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Ellen E. Lemire on behalf of John Kuppens, WinnCompanies LLC (Lemire, Ellen) |
Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT , Second against WinnCompanies LLC, John Kuppens, filed by Genesa Mendes.(Ruggieri, Janet) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John Kuppens, WinnCompanies LLC. (Kokodis, Alice) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by John Kuppens, WinnCompanies LLC.(Kokodis, Alice) |
Filing 12 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. Accordingly, and for the foregoing reasons,1. Plaintiff's second motion to amend the complaint (Dkt. No. #8 ) is GRANTED;2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. #5 ) is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal;3. Plaintiff's motion to stay the deadline for opposing the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. #9 ) is DENIED as moot; and4. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to oppose the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. #10 ) is DENIED as moot.So Ordered. (de Oliveira, Flaviana) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Andro S. Hannoush on behalf of John Kuppens, WinnCompanies LLC (Hannoush, Andro) |
Filing 10 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to to Oppose Motions to Dismiss until motion to amend is acted upon by Genesa Mendes.(Ruggieri, Janet) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Stay re #5 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) filed by Defendants by Genesa Mendes.(Ruggieri, Janet) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Amend Complaint a second time by Genesa Mendes. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Plaintiff's counsel in support of amendment, #2 Exhibit Proposed amended complaint)(Ruggieri, Janet) |
Filing 7 STATE COURT Record. (Kokodis, Alice) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) filed by John Kuppens, WinnCompanies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Alice A. Kokodis)(Kokodis, Alice) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) by John Kuppens, WinnCompanies LLC.(Kokodis, Alice) |
Filing 4 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by WinnCompanies LLC. (Kokodis, Alice) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by John Kuppens, WinnCompanies LLC ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9728192 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Notice to State Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Form)(Kokodis, Alice) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.